Your JavaScript and TypeScript teams already run ESLint like it's a compulsion, so the rules you care about most shouldn't have to live somewhere else. Write a requirement in plain English (say, "never use eval()" or "no imports from the legacy payments module") and Zenable now generates a ready-to-run ESLint configuration to enforce it. Generated configs lean on core and plugin rules where they fit and fall back to no-restricted-syntax and no-restricted-imports selectors when your requirement doesn't map to an off-the-shelf rule, with violation messages that tell developers what to do instead, not just what they did wrong.
ESLint joins Semgrep, CodeQL, Checkov, OPA, and eight other engines in our guardrail lineup, and the generator picks it only when a requirement is actually JavaScript/TypeScript-shaped. The payoff for JS/TS teams: deterministic, zero-inference-latency enforcement in a tool your toolchain already runs. This reflects a core belief at Zenable: deterministic and AI-based reviews are both first-class citizens, running in parallel and offsetting each other's downsides. The output is standard eslintrc-shaped JSON, so it drops into your editor's lint step, pre-commit, or CI with nothing new to install or learn. Zenable keeps it in sync with the requirement as it evolves, versioned like every other guardrail.
See generation in action in the ESLint guardrail docs, and tell us which engine we should teach your requirements to speak next.